What security actually attaches
A flexible workspace operator running twelve sites looks like a real estate business. It isn't — it holds long leases and sells short occupancy, which is lease arbitrage. The lender's security is over an operating company and a set of leasehold interests, not over property, and enforcing it means stepping into leases rather than selling assets.
Shipping has the mirror problem: the asset is genuinely owned and genuinely valuable, but it moves between jurisdictions, and the enforceability of a mortgage depends on where the vessel happens to be. In both cases the headline asset base overstates the recovery.
Occupancy and utilisation are the covenants that matter
Loan-to-value is close to meaningless in a leasehold business and only intermittently useful in shipping, where valuations swing with charter rates. The covenants that actually predict distress are operational: occupancy by site, utilisation by asset, charter coverage, weighted average lease expiry against the facility tenor.
A covenant package built on LTV will pass right up until the business fails. One built on utilisation gives both sides warning.
The information request is the first real diligence event
Before any credit decision, a lender learns most of what matters from how the borrower responds to the first structured information request. Group structure and intercompany flows. Financials disaggregated to site or asset level rather than consolidated into invisibility. The full lease or charter book with expiry and break profile. Unit economics per location or per vessel.
What a borrower can produce in two weeks — and in what form — says more about operational control than the audited accounts do.