Advisory / Transaction advisory

    Findings a buyer makes become price adjustments.

    Quality of earnings, data room and diligence response, run by the people who will still be answering the questions in week nine.

    Transaction advisory is the preparation and defence of financial information through a deal. Zenith produces quality-of-earnings analysis, builds and runs the data room, and answers buy-side or lender diligence directly — so the process moves on issues that are already understood rather than stalling on information that was never assembled.

    Who this is for

    Sellers preparing a process

    Companies that want the findings surfaced as housekeeping months before a buyer surfaces them as price.

    Buyers and acquirers

    Investors needing independent analysis of a target's earnings quality and working capital before committing.

    Borrowers facing lender diligence

    Companies where a financing turns on the defensibility of adjusted earnings and the borrowing base.

    Sponsor-backed groups

    Portfolio companies running bolt-ons where the same diligence discipline is needed repeatedly.

    How it works

    Three phases, each with a defined output and a handover point.

    Phase

    Quality of earnings

    • Normalised EBITDA bridge with every add-back evidenced
    • Revenue, cohort and margin analysis
    • Working capital, net debt and debt-like items
    • Issue list produced early, with remediation owners

    Phase

    Data room

    • Index build against a buyer's request list, not a generic one
    • Document collection, gap list and remediation
    • Access tiers, audit trail and disclosure control
    • Consistency check between the room, the model and the accounts

    Phase

    Diligence response

    • Q&A management to a single log and one timetable
    • Management presentation preparation and rehearsal
    • Adviser coordination across legal, tax and technical
    • Issue resolution through to signing and completion accounts

    Engagement

    How the engagement runs: who embeds, at what cadence, and where it ends.
    TermDetail
    Typical durationQoE 3 – 6 weeks; full process support 3 – 9 months
    Who embedsTransaction finance partner plus a modelling lead
    Deal sizeUSD 5m – 250m enterprise value
    Reporting cadenceWeekly issue log; daily Q&A turnaround in live diligence
    DeliverablesQoE report, EBITDA bridge, net debt and working capital analysis, data room, Q&A log
    Handover pointSigning, or completion accounts where the mandate extends to them

    Commercial model

    A fixed fee by scope, agreed before work begins, with process support priced monthly where the deal runs long. No success fee on a diligence mandate — the analysis has to be capable of telling the client not to proceed.

    Sectors

    What this service means in the sectors where Zenith runs it.

    Consumer and CPG

    Trade spend reclassification and deduction reconciliation — the single most common source of consumer deal repricing — run before the process starts.

    Sector page

    Lending and fintech

    Quality of earnings on a lending book means the loan tape, the provisioning policy and the vintage curves. Buyers price what they cannot verify, so verification comes first.

    Sector page

    Industrials and materials

    EBITDA bridges that hold up through a commodity cycle, add-backs a buyer will accept, and a working-capital peg negotiated on evidence rather than assertion.

    Sector page

    E-commerce and DTC

    Returns provisioning, deferred revenue and cohort quality of earnings prepared before a buyer's adviser finds them.

    Sector page

    Life sciences and medtech

    Separating funded research from commercial earnings, defending grant and milestone recognition, and building a data room a strategic acquirer's team can work through unassisted.

    1 mandateLife sciences and medtech

    Sector page

    Infrastructure and energy

    Diligence on contracted assets: revenue contracts, availability history, O&M cost base, and the gap between the model and the as-built reality.

    Sector page

    Real assets and shipping

    Normalising earnings across owning entities, charters and management agreements, and reconciling asset values to the numbers in the accounts.

    Sector page

    Asset managers and funds

    Track-record attribution, fee-income normalisation and operational due diligence readiness — the three findings that reprice a manager stake.

    Sector page

    Selected transactions

    Tagged to this service.

    Finding the cash wall the growth model concealed

    Pre-raise financial review — identified a projected cash shortfall in the out-year driven by regulatory spend, receivables build and instrument capex stacking in one period

    Sector
    Life sciences and medtech
    Geography
    United States
    Role
    Fundraise readiness
    Counterparty
    Status
    Advised

    Questions we are asked

    When should sell-side quality of earnings start?

    Before the process launches — ideally two to three months out. Findings discovered by a buyer become price adjustments; the same findings discovered early are housekeeping with time to fix them.

    Do you replace the auditor?

    No. Quality of earnings is analysis prepared for a transaction, not an audit opinion, and it looks at different things: sustainability of earnings rather than compliance of statements.

    What makes an add-back defensible?

    Evidence and consistency. A one-off cost that recurs in three consecutive years is not one-off, and a buyer's adviser will find it. We test add-backs the way the other side will before they appear in a bridge.

    How much of the data room work can our team do?

    The collection, usually. The index, the gap list and the disclosure judgement are where processes go wrong, and those are the parts we own.

    Can you act on the buy side?

    Yes, and not on both sides of the same transaction. Buy-side scope covers earnings quality, working capital, net debt and the commercial assumptions behind the model.

    What if the diligence finds something serious?

    It gets written down plainly and early. The value of the exercise is the client deciding what to do with a finding on their own timetable, rather than responding to it in a call with the counterparty.

    Start with the structure, not the pitch.

    Tell us the transaction and the timetable. If it is not something we should run, we will say so.